Celestron 31042 AstroMaster 114EQ Newtonian Reflector Telescope, Dark Blue

Failed to get a full refund to a faulty returned product

The installation is sooooo complicated. It’s been 6 months and I couldn’t do anything with this $1000 gadget. I later realized some parts are missing but now I’m in a phase where I can even return this item :(

not usable

Il pacco è arrivato con un giorno di ritardo, avevo pagato la spedizione 1 giorno ma qualcosa non ha funzionato, poco male Amazon mi ha restituito la differenza. Assemblato in un oretta buona senza problemi, il quick start e il manuale sono in inglese ma sul sito Celestron trovate anche il pdf in italiano, il tubo è arrivato collimato dalla fabbrica e sembra ok ma comprerò un tool di calibrazione. Mediocri gli oculari specie quello da 10mm (lo stesso in dotazione al Travelscope70), il 20mm è utilizzabile anche per la visione terrestre ma il raddrizzatore incorporato si mangia luce se comparato ad un mio oculare Celestron 20mm budget puro (20mm in dotazione al Travelscope70). In questa fascia di prezzo è comunque normale dover sostituire gli oculari con prodotti di maggiore qualità. Vi ricordo che state comprando un telescopio a riflessione quindi l'immagine appare capovolta, questo non è considerato un difetto in astronomia poichè nello spazio non esiste l'alto-basso, potreste comprarvi un raddrizzatore (come quello incorporato nell'oculare da 20mm) ma così facendo perdereste luce poichè aggiungereste un sistema di specchi o un prisma e questo si che viene considerato un difetto. Avendo alcuni oculari compresa una Barlow 2x Celestron Omni non ho avuto nessun problema e vi consiglio caldamente di procuravi una Barlow se non volete vedere puntini o poco più. Un riflettore decente ad un prezzo ottimo se preso sotto i 200euro, certo hanno risparmiato sullo specchio primario che non è parabolico bensì sferico come precisato nella scheda del prodotto alla voce "support" sul sito Celestron ma per comprarvi un modello analogo dotato di specchio parabolico spendereste quasi il doppio, il lato negativo è che questo specchio perde luce e potrebbe introdurre un pochino di aberrazione sferica. Il trepiedi EQ2 è abbastanza stabile se lo montate bene e con i pesi ben distribuiti, unico vero neo il distanziatore in plastica non mi fa sentire sicuro quindi siate delicati quando lo aprite o lo chiudete . Un consiglio, io uso il telescopio seduto su uno sgabello regolabile quindi non ho bisogno di estendere i tubi telescopici rendendo il trepiedi estremamente stabile, Eq2 base ma fa il suo lavoro. Qualcuno ha lamentato problemi di collisioni delle manopole o col motore, beh questo succede solo se montate male il trepiedi oppure se pensate di utilizzarlo come se fosse un trepiedi azimutale, con l'equatoriale vi bastano piccoli movimenti per alzare o "girare" il tubo e se tocca qualche manopola è perchè lo state usando male. Aggiornamento: Ho avuto l'astromaster 130 per un'anno ora ho qualcosa di meglio come un Maksutov 127mm e posso dire questo, se preso intorno ai 180 euro va bene , ha lo specchio sferico e non parabolico e non è propio il massimo e raramente potrete apprezzare stelle puntiformi ed alto contrasto che un Maksutov è in grado di regalare, tralasciando il mediocre cercatore e sostituiti gli oculari davvero pessimi il resto potrebbe andare ma è solo questione di prezzo, se volete un riflettore cercate di prenderlo con specchio parabolico i prezzi sono decisamente scesi, i difetti che lo sferico introduce si notano eccome quando si passa a qualcosa di meglio, come primo telescopio ovviamente non si può che esserrne entusiasti ma con l'esperienza si capisce che non è granchè.

المنتج رائع ومثالي للفئه الهاوية للتبع الكواكب النجوم مع اخذ الاعتبار بامتلاك عدسات مناسبه اضافيه

Last week I received my NexStar 130 SLT. I made the decision to buy this scope based almost entirely on the recommendations of reviewers both here on Amazon and elsewhere. This is my first telescope, and I will say will say up front that I am completely happy with this scope! Regarding the negative reviews, I can sympathize that in some cases a truly defective article can arrive. For many, I would suspect that the issues encountered were largely of their own making. While in the main, this scope is relatively simple to set up and use, it still helps to have at least a modicum of technical skill (a healthy dose of common sense will help too!). The evening I received the scope (15 July) I set it up on my deck. Yes, not the most stable of platform, but I live in a dense neighborhood with lots of obstructions and murderous light pollution. The star alignment, using the 3-star "Star Align" process, took me two attempts. I blame my ineptitude with the use of an eyepiece and not having stars truly centered in the field of view for this. Regarding this, I think an eyepiece with a crosshair would be excellent for performing these alignments. (Another night I had multiple failures. This turned out to be related to the incorrect time, which was off by a few hours. The system will apparently remember the last values you entered. Be advised, they will not update and will be incorrect. Check your time and date each time you power up the system! (Many complain that the system does not retain the time once it is entered. I would venture a guess here as to why. The simple truth is that it would drift off of "real" time within a very short matter of time. Maybe adding the optional GPS module would fix this problem, but the internal NexStar clock is simply freewheeling and will inevitably be off the longer it ran on its own. Having to re-enter it each time you power up ensures that time is not an issue during the alignment procedure. Imagine your frustration if you took tons of time aligning each star in your eyepiece, and despite your best efforts the system would not align? Re-entering the time alleviates this factor, assuming you enter it correctly!) For my location, I simply plotted my deck in Google Earth and wrote down the coordinates. This seems to have enough fidelity for the star alignment to work. Once I had the telescope aligned I picked a random bright object in the southern sky to examine. Imagine my surprise when the first celestial body I have ever viewed through a telescope turned out to be Saturn! Using the provided 9mm eyepiece, the rings were clearly visible. I had not yet received my collimation eyepiece, so I was worried that it might need an adjustment. No adjustment necessary on my scope at this time! I am looking forward to viewing through higher-quality optics though. Regarding the stability issues that many have commented about. Yes, images do move about quite easily, especially on my wooden deck. I have not yet weighted the tripod or gotten a set of the damping pads. I will say that image stabilization is not completely unbearable on my scope. In just a couple of seconds after making a focusing or alignment adjustment, images became still enough to view nicely. I can only imagine this will improve with weights and dampers. I do see why this scope would not be ideal for astrophotograpy though. I would think it would not be impossible, but you would have to ensure the scope is deployed on a solid foundation and go to great lengths not to disturb the scope in any way. I was able to configure and control my scope with Celestron's enclosed NexStar Observer List (NSOL) software and the freeware Stellarium packages relatively painlessly. Install the drivers that come with your USB-to-Serial Port adapter. (The computer interface to the NexStar handset requires a serial RJ-11 phone jack. Celestron sells a cable with an RJ-11 phone connector on one end and computer 9-pin RS-232 serial port connector on the other. Most likely your computer/laptop will not have a serial port, so you will have to further adapt this to USB) My laptop configured the COM3 serial port, but your mileage may vary depending on your system. Make sure to restart your computer once the drivers are installed. Truth in advertising, I tested my scope indoors using an arbitrary alignment. The scope tracked and moved what seemed to be the proper azimuths and elevations for the objects I selected in the software. Any issues I find in the wild once I get the scope outside again can likely be mitigated with the anti-backlash settings for the motor drive. If there is anything significant I find, I'll make an update! Regarding some of the slewing, anti-backlash, and cord wrap settings, I would have appreciated a little more information in the manual as to what the settings actually do and how they work. I did see an example where my scope attempted to go the long way around counterclockwise to a position that just should have been about 10 degrees clockwise. This was very likely due to bad settings in the aforementioned utilities. I made a few tweaks after that and the problem seems to be alleviated, though I am not exactly sure which setting did the trick! :-) At the end of the day, I have to say that for the money, this scope does everything it is intended to do. Have some realistic expectations going in. You are not going to get Hubble Space Telescope views out of this scope! But you will get a lot of enjoyment out of it if you take the time to set it up and align it properly. I did get a good view of a deep space galaxy, which as many have stated, was simply a distant smudge of stars. However, it was clearly visible amongst the background of distinct stars.

Çok iyi bir teleskop. Başlangıç için 50AZ modelini almıştım ama arasında çok fark var. Andromeda, jüpiter, saturn ve niceleri telefonumda var ama "AMAZON TÜRKİYEDE RESİMLERİ AÇSA GÖSTERECEM!" Eğer çok üst segment alıp para basmayacam diyorsanız ideal. Çok ekmeğini de yedim ürünün ;) 2 eksisi var el ile taşınmaz çok ağır. Ekstra lens alıp geliştirmek lazım. Jüpiterin 2 büyük çizgisi ve büyük kırmızı gözü lens yardımı ile gözüküyor. Ayrıca fotozeynep ile 1 günde kapınızda.

5 estrellas banda, viene completo y cuidadosamente empacado, observe júpiter por primera vez y se ve hermoso (pequeño pero hermoso) aunque mi celular no capta bien se ve muy bonito y nítido :0