Nikon D7100 24.1 MP DX-Format CMOS Digital SLR (Body Only)

Sin duda la mejor cámara DX. La recomiendo ampliamente. Gran precio por amazon y es una cámara con muchas funciones profesinonales, gran construcción y muy buena calidad de imagen. Sólo hace falta invertir en una buena óptica. Si tienen presupuesto apretado, recomiendo el nikkor 35mm DX. Gran lente Prime por un muy buen precio.

What can I say ? Im no pro but this is the best camera I have ever owned, beats the D3100 I had by a mile, easy to use..watch all the Youtube reviews and you will see its very darn good and takes clear sharp pics without and effort at all...Im using it with a Nikon 35mm 1.8 G and the pics turn out great...Im not even really trying hard..lol..buy it.

Die Kamera kam mit allem Zubehör und Originalhandbuch in der Originalverpackung. Beim Durchsehen habe nur einen fast nicht erkennbaren Kratzer auf dem Display gesehen, der nicht weiter stört. Alles andere ist top, die Kamera sieht aus wie neu aus dem Laden.

Buy it! super DURABLE ! Fell down 3X !!! and it still worked! 1st drop: while getting out of the car, it slid out of the bag and -aaargh! -bounced on the cement driveway. Luckily, it worked/shot good. Then, when I turned it over to my buddy who wanted to test it during a BBQ, it slipped out of his oily hands and dropped on the floor! OMG! but luckily, it still worked!!! Gosh! what a relief. After the BBQ, for some unknown reason, it again slipped out of the bag and bounced for 3rd time on the driveway! OMG! but again, luckily it still worked. and No scratched! (pls see pix) btw , I re-started this old hobby a couple of weeks ago and got this. When I stopped 2015, I was already familiar using Nikon D7000. I saw the D7100 and saw it had better video capability and was affordable, so I got it. I expected a rundown used cam, but it was alright - even at 45K shutter count. Plus , Durable too! Its focus seems better than my old D700. Overall, having fun with this Nikon D7100. HTH, Thanks.

I had to make a major decision before buying the D7100: FX or DX. I have been dithering for quite a while and have a hodge podge of Nikon lenses. FX lenses include the 24-70mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/4.0, and a TC-14E II teleconverter. DX lenses include the 10-24mm and the 85mm VR micro. My belief is that DX was the right way to go for me because 1) good DX cameras produce superb photos, 2) I can buy less expensive lenses because the pretend focal lengths are larger, 3) only the sweetest part of FX lenses (their centers) will be used, 4) DX camera bodies will remain less expensive, and 5) my default print size is only 13"x19". This introductory paragraph is not to convince you that DX is the right way to go but to explain why I bought this camera instead of a D600 or D800. Let me start by saying that I love this camera! Nikon managed to do a few stupid things that I'll mention below but let's talk about the positives first. The shutter release - including focusing, VR, and metering - is so fast that it's hard to press just half way to lock readings. I'm sure there is some shutter lag but I couldn't measure it. Focus is spot on with all my lenses and I have not used the capability to do individual lens adjustments. Other positives as reported by most other reviewers: camera feel (solid); good controls; sensible blend between menus, buttons, and dials; viewfinder setup and image size; etc. I have read some other reviewers that say this camera isn't very sharp. Not so! If you have moved up from a 10-12 megapixel to this one, you can be fooled as I was. I typically pixel peep in photoshop with the image at 100%, i.e., one picture pixel per one monitor pixel. You are looking at a much smaller piece of real estate in this mode when you have twice as many pixels per unit area and that means that you are looking at smaller, less contrasty details. Remember, manufacturer's MTF curves pretty much measure contrast as an approximation to sharpness. Of course the pictures look "oh my god" sharper when you print them since they have twice as many pixels per unit area on paper. I shoot 14-bit raw images with loseless compress and rarely use the 1.3 crop mode though I've mapped crop mode to one of the external buttons. Warning, the full-sized raw files are 25-30 megabytes and that means you can only store about 35 files per gigabyte of hard disk. So make your plans carefully before buying your next large pixel-count camera. Further, photoshop 16-bit psd files from D7100 images take 137MB on disk. I think that I would have bought a less capable camera if I were not shooting raw and running a 16-bit post process. Raw and 16-bit processing are not snobbery, rather they allow me to make up for virtually every type of error at picture-taking time except bad focus, bad subject selection, and excessive camera shake. That for me is the big advantage of digital photography but the D7100 or any other large pixel-count sensor makes you pay in disk storage. Now lets talk briefly about a few snafus. SubjectDistance is a standard Exif parameter and used to be generated in all Nikon DSLR images. ApproximateSubjectDistance is not a standard EXIF parameter but D7100 firmware generates it instead of SubjectDistance! Why is that bad? Three reasons: 1) photoshop will not display the field, 2) ViewNX 2 - Nikon's own software - dosen't display this nonstandard field either, and 3) Nikon support staff will not comment on whether or not either, neither, or both software and firmware will be repaired. The simplest way to recover the information is to load the sidecar file created by photoshop into a text editor and search on "distance" and read a fractional number. I can also convert that distance from metric if I like using a pencil or a calculator. Only a diseased mind could cause such nonsense. Another snafu reported by many in these reviews is the smallish memory buffer that limits rapid shooting. Memory is really cheap - I'd guess that for a two dollar bill, four times as much memory could have been included. I almost never use multiple shot modes or bracketing; rather my problem arises when my shutter finger gets itchy. This is a rarely occurring issue but the symptom of an outrageously dumb parting decision. I have rated this camera 5 stars in spite of these silly design flaws. However, I'd pay money to enter a raffle to paddle Nikon suits who impose these decisions. (The other manufacturers are just as lame.) It's a great camera, impressive in so many ways. Picture quality is great and the camera is capable enough to allow top-notch image capture despite a huge number of tough environmental conditions.