Men's Undershirts Micro Modal Ultra Soft T-Shirts Stretch Moisture-Wicking Crewneck/V-Neck Tees for Men, 3-Pack

I first encountered David Archy in 2017 with the low expectations typical of the affordable basics market—and the product was a revelation. Their early mid-rise briefs were rooted in functional utility; they were thoughtfully designed by people who clearly prioritized the physical reality of the wearer over the "visual brand" of the garment. Comfort was the primary objective, and the results were exceptional. Unfortunately, David Archy eventually underwent a pivot that mirrored the broader American trend: a shift from substance-driven comfort to image-driven signaling. In an attempt to chase the "aesthetic" market, the design language became increasingly performative. The newer products sacrificed ergonomic integrity—resulting in aggressive leg openings, disproportionate sizing, and odd seam placement—all to satisfy a visual trend. One of my few reliable staples was effectively "optimized" out of existence to serve customers more concerned with how their underwear photographs than how it functions. These shirts, however, are a rare homage to the brand’s original philosophy. They are spectacular—a genuine achievement in soft, durable, and luxurious construction. The micro-modal fabric provides a tactile quality that is increasingly rare in a market dominated by "high-arousal" branding. My only critique is a matter of functional logic: for a garment marketed as an undershirt, the sizing is inexplicably large. An undershirt’s value lies in its "functional invisibility" beneath other layers; here, the proportions are so generous that sizing down is necessary to achieve a proper fit. That said, the quality is so high that they have become indispensable in my daily rotation as lounge and pajama wear. This is a glimpse of the brand’s former self—back when the product was designed for the wearer’s comfort rather than the observer’s eye. Reflecting on these very American “trends”, the decline of functional basics is a symptom of a culture particularly sensitive to social signaling. In the U.S., social status is largely performative; individuals are highly attuned to the risks of being perceived as "outdated" or "uncool," even in the most private spheres. This creates a unique form of social anxiety where even a choice as mundane as a pair of briefs becomes a potential liability. This obsession with "curating" every layer of life is the byproduct of a culture that treats the self as a brand to be managed. The American market feels a constant pressure to avoid the "social shame" of being obsolete, which makes it nearly impossible to buy something “uncool” like mid-rise briefs with functional invisibility, as one easily could in a place like London, Paris, or even Montreal or Vancouver.

Great shirts. Worth the price. Have tried many brands. These fit the best, hold their shape after washing and feel great wearing

My normal size in cotton is LARGE @ 5'11''. I have a proportionally correct figure, somewhat muscular build and not fat or overweight. Large in this shirt is way too big for me. Large is baggy everywhere and too long (hangs past the boys). Medium is just about right if I am wearing it without a shirt over the top in public but also seems a bit too long. I like this shirt to fit close to my skin and the small accomplishes that. If you have a bit of a belly like me, it will obviously show through the shirt. That's why I only wear the smalls at home if nothing else is worn over the top. Laundering these shirts is a bit of a pain. Wash in cold or warm, Dry with very low or no heat. To me it's worth the extra hassle. VERY soft and breathable undershirt so, be warned that you will not want to wear regular cotton undershirts EVER again. You will likely throw them all away like I am about to. The moisture wicking works quite well. I spilled water down the front of my shirt and it was dry in just minutes. The shirt is very thin material but I have experienced nothing to suggest it will tear or rip from rough usage.

These are very nice micromodal undershirts with a noticeably more tapered fit than most alternatives. They sit closer to the body, which works well under dress shirts and avoids excess fabric bunching. The material is soft, lightweight, and performs well in terms of comfort and moisture handling. Overall, they feel like a premium product. The reason for the 4/5 rating is value. There are other micromodal options available at less than half the price that come very close in terms of performance and feel. If you prioritize fit and are willing to pay a bit more, these are a strong choice. But from a pure value perspective, there are comparable alternatives.

I have been wearing Calvin Klein’s micro modal v-neck and crew neck t-shirts for years as both undershirts and casual lounging shirts / pajama shirts, and was willing to pay the premium price tag because I was never able to find anything better; they’re soft, fit nicely and have just the right amount of stretch. And then I decided to go out on a limb and try these David Archy v-necks, fully expecting to regret the decision and deal with the annoyance of returning them but figured it was worth the risk given the significantly lower price point. I’m glad I took the risk. Much to my surprise, I found the David Archy product to be superior in every respect notwithstanding the lower price. Specifically: (1) The David Archy shirts stay feeling softer / newer for longer thank the CK shirts, which seem to loose some of their ultra comfortable feel after a few weeks of wear. (2) The shirts feel slightly thicker and higher quality than their CK counterparts and as a result are more durable through numerous wash cycles. Not only does the fabric itself hold up better but the whites stay whiter and blacks stay blacker longer. (3) They don’t have any annoying tags sewn into the inside of the shirt that wind up being scratchy against your skin. (4) The “v” in the v-neck generally holds up better than the CK version, which seems to get a big crinkly and not as crisp after a few washes. (5) I find that the shirts just generally drape better over my body (athletic build) than the CK shirts. In my view, the only drawback of these David Archy shirts is that they only come in a v-neck version (at least at the time of this review); I wish they also made a crew neck version. If you’ve got a drawer full of CK micro modal t-shirts like I once had and are considering taking a chance on this David Archy product as an alternative, I’d strongly encourage you to do so. You won’t be disappointed. Never mind the lower price — it is simply a superior product.

These are very comfortable undershirts. I chose a large but I think I should have chosen the medium. The large feels a little too big even though the sizing chart said that was my size. These are very soft and comfortable and will move with your body. You will hardly notice you have an undershirt on. If washed correctly they won’t lose their color or their softness.

Bottom line: this is far and away the best quality undershirt you can get for the price, and quite possibly the best undershirt you can own, depending on what you're looking for, which I'll illustrate below: The black modal v-neck is super lightweight, with under-armor levels of stretch and similar shine, but more structure, making it more wearable as a top layer but still a little too sheer and lightweight for my tastes in an outer layer. However, it's definitely not lighter weight, loose under-armor that fits like a poncho. Modal is in general an awesome material, and fairly hard to find in a t-shirt (let alone at this price point), it fits almost invisibly under nearly any shirt, and it maintains it's shape, so your sleeves don't bunch up. It's also quite long, so it leaves plenty of room to tuck in (but this might be a negative if you intend on wearing the shirt on it's own). Other than that, the shirt fits a little on the large end compared to a "standard" shirt, but because it both stretches and drapes exceedingly well, I'd still go with your "regular" size, unless you plan on wearing it on it's own on a regular basis. With that being said, the undershirt closest in quality that I've ever purchased was the same price for a single shirt (which ultimately, wasn't as nice as these)...so moving forward, I'm going all in on these whenever I need new undershirts!

Great texture, nice length. For an undershirt the neck is too tight and visible. Every time I wear it under a regular shirt the white part can be sign at the neck line. Frustrating. This is even true with the crew neck shirts.